July 29, 2012
H. Kevin Derr
First Church of the Brethren
Mark 7:24-37
“Faith”
Mark 7:24-37 24 Jesus left that place and went to the vicinity of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know it; yet he could not keep his presence secret. 25 In fact, as soon as she heard about him, a woman whose little daughter was possessed by an evil spirit came and fell at his feet. 26 The woman was a Greek, born in Syrian Phoenicia. She begged Jesus to drive the demon out of her daughter. 27 “First let the children eat all they want,” he told her, “for it is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.” 28 “Yes, Lord,” she replied, “but even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” 29 Then he told her, “For such a reply, you may go; the demon has left your daughter.” 30 She went home and found her child lying on the bed, and the demon gone. 31 Then Jesus left the vicinity of Tyre and went through Sidon, down to the Sea of Galilee and into the region of the Decapolis. 32 There some people brought to him a man who was deaf and could hardly talk, and they begged him to place his hand on the man. 33 After he took him aside, away from the crowd, Jesus put his fingers into the man’s ears. Then he spit and touched the man’s tongue. 34 He looked up to heaven and with a deep sigh said to him, “Ephphatha!” (which means, “Be opened!”). 35 At this, the man’s ears were opened, his tongue was loosened and he began to speak plainly. 36 Jesus commanded them not to tell anyone. But the more he did so, the more they kept talking about it. 37 People were overwhelmed with amazement. “He has done everything well,” they said. “He even makes the deaf hear and the mute speak.”
What does it take to be healed? Is it the faith of the individual, is it a word or command from Jesus, or is it a touch of the hand, a touch of the clothing of Jesus or even the touch of Jesus’ saliva? We often retreat to faith as the operative element of healing, if you have enough faith you will be healed, but then no faithful person should ever die. We tend t o build systems to explain things that don’t make any sense to us, we do this with stories about nature, with stories about faith, with stories about things that scare us.
There are people in our rational world who think that if they wear their team’s jersey, it will increase the likelihood that their team will win. In the same way people do all sorts of superstitious precautions. What do you do if you spill salt, throw some over your should, I don’t recall if it is to be the right or the left. People are cautions about breaking mirrors, and the like. We create structures to support our ideas and rationalize our fears. Be that wearing our team’s jersey so that they will win or not waking under a ladder or avoiding the 13th floor of a building.
We do the same thing when we read scripture, we attempt to find a way to allow this or any other biblical narrative to intermesh with our lives and to do so without requiring any change for us. Assimilating scripture without change is adding religion to our lives, like adding ketchup to French Fries, it does not change the nature of the thing we add religion to or Ketchup, just makes it taste a little better. When we allow the whole story of Jesus to transform our lives and we become disciples then we will be c hanged. We will be a new creation in Christ Jesus.\
Prayer:
I. After the face off with the Pharisees and the Sadducees, Jesus leaves Capernaum. Jesus seems to like his personal space; he seems to be in real terms an introvert, drawing energy from solitude and not from the crowd. Mark tells us, 37 24 Jesus left that place and went to the vicinity of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know it; yet he could not keep his presence secret. 25 In fact, as soon as she heard about him, a woman whose little daughter was possessed by an evil spirit came and fell at his feet.
a. Jesus left Capernaum and I snow in the region around Tyre. He goes into a house, whose we don’t know, and he stays there attempting to have a time away from the crowd.
i. This is a gentile area, is a Philistine or Phoenician population, and here Jesus is seeking refuge from the press of the crowds or time away and alone.
1. Regardless of his attempts to keep his identity secret, he is discovered. Paparazzi are not a new phenomenon, Jesus is discovered.
2. Somehow the word about Jesus got out, and a woman of whose daughter was possessed by an evil spirit, a demon, came and fell at his feet.
a. This woman assumes a position of inferiority, she submits to Jesus as one who has less power and authority.
b. This may not be socially appropriate today, but in the context she is doing some thing that is correct.
i. She is indicating that Jesus is a man of authority that deserves such respect.
ii. Mark then tells us a little more about this woman, he writes, 26 The woman was a Greek, born in Syrian Phoenicia. She begged Jesus to drive the demon out of her daughter.
1. She is possible Greek speaking, but is clearly Hellenistic in her cultural background. Ethnically she is Phoenician born in Syria as opposed to North Africa in the region of Carthage.
2. Culturally Greek, Phoenician by ethnicity, a Semitic group and she probably could have passed for Jewish in appearance.
a. Mark makes it abundantly clear that this woman is not Jewish
b. She is an unclean gentile, with a child that is demon possessed. The issue of demon possession was not limited to adults, but also effected children, and both men and women.
3. She begs Jesus to drive the demon out of her.
iii. Jesus does not seem to be inclined to help her, listen to what he says, 27 “First let the children eat all they want,” he told her, “for it is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.”
1. the children here are the Jews, the Children of Abraham, if you will, and the dogs are the gentiles.
a. In fact, dog was a common word used to speak of gentiles, and dogs were not highly regarded in their culture, they were scavengers.
i. There is some indication that there are house dogs, those that live with the household, dogs that helped to protect the family, and they ate what fell on the floor.
2. Regardless, Jesus does not say something nice to this woman, he calls her a dog.
a. He tells her that what he has is for the Jews, and does so in a way that clearly depicts this bifurcated culture.
i. The children get the bread first, and they are to eat their fill.
ii. Then any crumbs that fall to the floor may be eaten by the dogs.
1. Jesus is essentially saying to this woman, after Israel is taken care of if there is anything left over, then perhaps.
b. Jesus comes across as harsh, bigoted and defending racial divisions.
i. He does not sound like the God who is love.
3. So, what do we do with a text like this?
a. We could say that Jesus was simply a man of his time, but that is not all that satisfying intellectually or spiritually.
b. We could say that he said this all tongue in check, he said the right things, but he said them in such a way that anyone present would have realized that they were in jest, and unfortunately the text does not indicate his tone of voice or his facial expression as he was speaking.
i. The trouble is that this Jesus does not sit well with the image that we have cultivated.
1. Perhaps our image is out of focus.
2. But, then we have to come to terms with a Jesus who is bigoted.
3. That is not a satisfying position either.
c. We could claim that Jesus is simply seeing how badly this woman wants her daughter healed.
4. Regardless of what we think, something significant is happening here. Mark continues the account, he writes, 28 “Yes, Lord,” she replied, “but even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” 29 Then he told her, “For such a reply, you may go; the demon has left your daughter.” 30 She went home and found her child lying on the bed, and the demon gone.
a. The woman agrees with Jesus. She understands all to well that everything is limited, honor, healing, health and food. She understands this.
b. She does not disagree that Jesus is Jewish and his mission is first to the Jews, and while such a think may not resonate with us, it make sense in the context of this woman’s life and experience.
i. So she responds, “Yes, Lord” indicating that the children should eat their fill before then dogs under the table. But she continues, “but even the doges under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”
1. She is not asking to be treated as a Jew, but just like a dog under the table eating the scraps.
2. Then Jesus cast out the Demon, but notice there is no command, no action, no gesture, just his assurance to the woman that the demon is gone.
3. She goes home and finds the demon gone and her daughter resting.
c. You have to ask, did this woman get who Jesus was, did she understand something of the kingdom and that he was more than just a healer.
i. It seems so
ii. It is none the less an odd exchange.
1. We can and should learn from this that God’s grace is not only for those who follow him, after all he makes the sun rise on all and send the rain.
2. There is an experience of Grace beyond those who are followers of Jesus.
3. That grace should point people to Christ Jesus.
II. The next encounter we see is also in a non-Jewish context, in the Decapolis. A gentile man is brought to Jesus by his friends. Mark writes, 31 Then Jesus left the vicinity of Tyre and went through Sidon, down to the Sea of Galilee and into the region of the Decapolis. 32 There some people brought to him a man who was deaf and could hardly talk, and they begged him to place his hand on the man.
a. Jesus fame as a healer has spread far beyond the Jewish population, gentiles are bringing people to Jesus to be healed. This man in question is deaf, and as a result is unable to speak well.
i. These people begged Jesus to place his hands on him and heal him.
ii. Mark continues, 33 After he took him aside, away from the crowd, Jesus put his fingers into the man’s ears. Then he spit and touched the man’s tongue. 34 He looked up to heaven and with a deep sigh said to him, “Ephphatha!” (which means, “Be opened!”). 35 At this, the man’s ears were opened, his tongue was loosened and he began to speak plainly.
1. We find Jesus doing some odd things here
a. He put his fingers into the man’s ears
b. He then spit on his hands and touched the deaf man’s tongue with the saliva
c. Then he looked up and said, “Ephphatha” or “Be opened.”
d. Then the man could hear and speak plainly
2. So why did Jesus have to do these things and with the demon possessed child just say that it was done.
a. There is a feel of folk magic to this account, was all this to communicate to these people that he could do these things while the woman already understood this truth?
i. The people in the second account begged Jesus to touch him and heal him, the woman in the first account simply asked for help.
1. She seems to have a greater understanding of who Jesus is.
2. Clearly what we understand of Jesus will clearly impact the way we come to Jesus and how we speak to him and of him.
b. Our level of knowledge will not change our salvation, but the more we know Jesus there will be a change in our interaction with Jesus.
b. These accounts are similar, both times Jesus is seeking solitude and is approached by people to heal people that they love. In both occasions they are gentiles who need healing.
i. Jesus does no preaching or teaching among these people and yet his fame and renown continue to spread.
III. The closing of these accounts tells us something we have heard before, 36 Jesus commanded them not to tell anyone. But the more he did so, the more they kept talking about it. 37 People were overwhelmed with amazement. “He has done everything well,” they said. “He even makes the deaf hear and the mute speak.”